Wednesday, February 22, 2012

EDLD 5352 Web Conference Summary

This summary is from the web conference held on February 18th.

The discussion started with everyone introducing themselves and putting what school/district they taught in. Then everyone started asking about TK 20 and how that fits into the grad program and the expectations of using this program to finish the masters. Most of the discussion was spent talking about getting certified and the steps necessary to become an administrator. It is good to collaborate with other people across the state to learn and verify how to go through this process. I feel as though most of us are learning as we go and some find the bits of information that we need to take the next step. This discussion was very informative and it was good to see the viewpoints and opinions from some of my fellow grad students.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

EDLD 5352 Action Plan

No.

Activity

Timeline

Responsible Person(s)

Resources

Measure and Evaluation

1

Assist campuses in providing training to

teachers in designing engaging instruction with the use of technology

May of 2012

Curriculum Facilitators,

Principals,

Asst. Principal for Curriculum,

Teachers on Special Assignment

Grant Funding,

Staff Development funds

TAKS results at 100% or above with 15 percentage point increase in

commended scores

2

Train teachers to develop and implement

Differentiated technology lessons for instruction of

students in all special programs (Dyslexia,

SPED, GT, ESL)

May of 2012

Director of Special Programs,

Principals,

Technology Leadership Team,

Asst. Supt. C & I

Printing costs for training materials

Feedback from session evaluation forms; lesson plans and sample

Lessons;

All 5th & 8th grade students in special programs pass the TAKS

Reading test

3

Provide in-depth data disaggregation for

state and district assessments

May of 2012

Teachers on Special Assignment,

Principals

Technology Department,

Membership in Texas Association of

Supervisors of Mathematics (TASM),

Region 10,

Region 4 Curriculum Development

Participation at training sessions

Evidence of teachers utilizing data analysis to drive instruction

4

Coordinate the alignment and articulation

of technology both vertically and

horizontally to deliver a rigorous

curriculum to all students

May of 2012

Curriculum Facilitators,

Principals,

Asst. Principal for Curriculum,

Teachers on Special Assignment

Staff Development Funds, Technology Curriculum

Completed curriculum documents; documentation in lesson plans

5

Develop, administer, score and analyze

data on TEKS CHECKS for grades 3-12

August 2012

Teachers on Special Assignment,

Principals

TEKS manuals, Teacher work day to spend analyzing data

Analyzed data aligned with district goals and objectives

6

Implement a uniform technology initiative throughout the district

December 2013

Technology Coordinator, Campus Technology Coordinators, Teachers on Special Assignment, Assistant Principals

Gaggle program cost, Staff training costs to implement the program, software updates

Program is started and all teachers are using new program at least two times every week in the fall semester

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

EDLD 5352 PPoint

STaR Chart data for HPMS
View more presentations from andymwatkins


EDLD 5352 Blog Posting #1

My focus for this posting is no the progress of teaching and learning, which is one of the four components of the Texas Long Range Plan.

After analyzing my school data I saw that this area was our biggest weakness. The role of teaching and learning in the 21st century schools has changed drastically in the last decade. A major factor in this change is the role technology has played on education.

As educators and schools we must shift our teaching strategies and ideas from a teacher-centered curriculum to a more student-centered curriculum. If our students continue to be passive learners, even with the use of technology, then they are not being prepared for becoming critical thinkers as they leave the school system. Change is slow in education, but this is one area that needs to be talked about more often.

The trend has been consistent with slow growth at both the local and state levels in Texas. Not all districts fit into this category, but most schools are lagging behind in providing adequate progress for integrating technology in the classroom. I think with continued staff development and growth in the area of technology leadership the teaching and learning category will see marked improvement.

Technology and its uses are still fairly new to education. I think a vast majority of educators desire to have student-centered technology based classrooms. The real question lies in how we get there and do it well. As more educators continue to lead in this area the rest of education will follow.